Skip to main content

Angel's Blood by Nalini Singh

This book won out on the most likely to pull me out of my slump query. I do think it did the trick as I've read two more since and seem to be moving on. So thanks, guys. I was in dire straits. Prior to reading Angel's Blood, I was a Nalini Singh virgin. I'd heard nothing but good, but just never found myself in the mood for paranormal romance. My feelings on the genre are unsurprisingly similar to Thea's. However, this book, the first in Singh's new Guild Hunter series, is being billed as urban fantasy, which made it seem more palatable and like a good place to start. It does have several of my favorite urban fantasy characteristics. Kick-A** heroine, deadly vamps of the non-sparkly variety, strong world building, etc. But. As Thea points out, it remains a paranormal romance at heart. So if extremely heated situations make you cringe, giggle, or otherwise react unfavorably (as they do me), tread lightly here. 

Elena Devereaux is a vampire hunter. She's what is known as hunter-born and so it's not just her job. It's her calling. She could no more walk away from it than she could sprout wings and fly. Elena belongs to the Hunter's Guild and, as such, is hired out to those willing to pay to have an expert hunt, capture, and/or kill rogue vampires. In this world, vampires aren't the top man on the totem pole. That honor belongs to the angels. Specifically, the archangels. Archangels rule the world and, get this, they create vampires. Who are then at their beck and call for at least a hundred years of servitude. The vampires are pretty much evil incarnate, but interestingly enough, the angels are not their polar opposites, i.e. paragons of virtue and goodness. In fact, they're sort of outside the whole good vs. evil spectrum. They run the show. They use who and what they need to to keep the vampires and humans in line and, if you value your life, you stay out of their way. Life spices up for Elena when Raphael, the Archangel of New York, enlists her services to hunt down a rogue Archangel who has done the unthinkable and become a vampire himself. 

Here's the thing about Angel's Blood. It grew on me more after I finished it than it did while I was actually reading it. While I was reading it I spent a fair bit of time on the fence. Since finishing, I've found myself thinking about it throughout the day, wondering what will happen next and what the characters I particularly liked are getting up to in my absence. That's a pretty good sign, after the fact, I have to say. I had two main issues with the story, the romance and the backstory. I love me a good antihero so Raphael was right up my alley. So much so that I wanted his gradual transformation to something resembling something human to be even more gradual so that I could savor the process. And while I'm a big fan of protracted tension between the two main characters, this one tended heavily toward the sexual variety and I tend to like mine a little more cerebral. I kept wishing Elena and Raphael would wrangle a little more over the differences in their species and background and a little less over their mutual desire to jump the other's bones. Similarly I liked Elena, but I really wanted more on her backstory to push that like over to love. There are all kinds of hints at a dark past and I felt like a little more reveal earlier would come in handy sympathizing with her position in the present and understanding where she's coming from. That said, I still think this was a good place to start and I'm glad I read it. I'll be picking up the sequel to find out what happens to Elena and Raphael (and Ilium and Dmitri--love those two). 

Linkage

Comments

  1. Hmm, of the reviews so far, your one is the one I'm thinking I'll probably end up agreeing with. I think this book looks like I'll like the story/world but I'm wary of how the romance will be written. Anyway, will probably read this one, the premise intruiges me a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:57 PM

    I wasn't a huge fan of this one. Mainly because I disliked Elena. I also expected Rapahel to be darker. I know we were told he'd lost his humanity over and over, but I didn't feel it.

    (Off-Topic) By the way, Deanna Raybourn has posted that the next Julia Grey will probably be out October 2010. So that's two Deanna Raybourn books in one year!

    LauraJ

    ReplyDelete
  3. Janicu, yeah. The romance was distracting to me, I guess, and happened a bit faster than I thought was plausible. I'll be interested to see what you think.

    LauraJ, that is great news about the next Julia Grey. Two Raybourns in '10! I agree with you about Raphael. I have a hard time buying these ancient characters. I struggled with the same thing in Lord of the Fading Lands. It just seems so hard to convey the full scope of that kind of age and experience. Also, I had a hard time picturing him, what kind of clothes he wore, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous6:46 AM

    I really couldn't describe Raphael if someone asked me to, so I know what you mean. And while I do find the ancient beings bent very intriguing, I also have a hard time buying them. I certainly can't believe they fall in love so completely within 50 pages. Their prejudice and snobbery would be a thousand times worse than Mr. Darcy's from Pride and Prejudice.

    I meant to say that I did love Dmitri and Venom. So while I'm not sure I'll read the next book, (which is about Raphael and Elena again) I'm pretty sure I'd read a book about Dmitri, Venom or Ilium.

    LauraJ

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, it was pretty hard to swallow that of all the women in all the towns in all the world, none of them captivated him until Elena.

    Yeah, Ilium and Dmitri were awesome. Hope they play larger roles in the next one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:15 AM

    I enjoyed this one quite a bit, but then, I read a lot of paranormal romance. The secondary characters were wonderful and I'm looking forward to their role in future books.

    And I'd like to add my 'yea!' to the two Raybourn's in one year comment! :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

You Might Also Like

Triple Prize Pack Giveaway!

Not long ago I discovered a few of you tweeting to get me to the 300 follower mark. As little things I read on Twitter often do, that one sort of made my day. You're all really too sweet for words and I joked that perhaps it was time for a giveaway. The truth is I've been in the mood to have one for awhile now and this is as good a time as any. So here's the deal. This will be a triple prize pack giveaway, meaning there are three packs and you can indicate which one you'd like to be entered to win in the comments. I will choose three random winners and contact them. This giveaway is open to anywhere The Book Depository ships! Here's the list of countries, FYI. Since I tend to read a lot of urban fantasy, straight fantasy, and young adult, I've chosen a set of each including all books currently in print in that series.
The Urban Fantasy Pack The Kate Daniels series by Ilona Andrews (My reviews here, here, & here) The Fantasy Pack The Queen's Thief series by M…

Angie's Best Books of 2019

It is the last day of the year. How are you doing at this point? You good to go on? I'm going to. For a number of important reasons, which are too varied (or possibly too private) to enumerate here. So how about we say we shall go on because: "Gansey. That's all there is." I find that "Because Gansey" is highly motivating when motivation is thin on the ground.

Also thin on the ground have been my posts this year. And yet, I'm still not stopping. And I still greatly enjoy arriving at this final post of the year. And so here I leave my best books of the year. It wound up being a respectable nineteen titles this year. Nineteen for 2019. That's down a fair bit from last year's whopping twenty-eight, but rather on par with previous years' lists and more than 2016 and 2017, respectively. I'm pleased. I'm pleased with every book on this list, with every one of the books you shared with me and the ones I've been able to share with you. …

Angie’s Best Books of the Decade

I am winded, you guys. Winded from laboring over this list. This is the first time I've attempted to cobble together a Best Books of the Decade list, and I can't say I'll be up to it for another ten years or so. But my, I couldn't resist the challenge (or profound pleasure, if we're being honest). I kept trying to winnow it down, kept forcing myself to be ruthless. Like somehow I could (or should) keep it to a top ten (flat impossible) or at least a top twenty-five (who are we kidding?). But after bidding those constraints good riddance, I really did press myself to take a hard, clear look at what hurts (to mangle my favorite Hemingway quote). Because these novels hurt in the best way. Each entry on this list is a five-star book in my books. Which means I wouldn't change a single thing about a single one of them. They are the ones I call perfect when I recommend them to friends and strangers. They are the ones I have read and reread over the past ten years and…